“you can’t tell people that they don’t have a right to their opinion.”
I want to break this down a bit...true anyone can have any opinion they want. But what we challenge is not the right to have an opinion, it is the veracity of that opinion. People can believe in the spaghetti monster if they want to or the tooth fairy or god, or science or anything else, but every opinion needs to be challenged otherwise there is no difference as you pointed out, between truth and baloney.
The point is, any opinion not aligned with objective reality, i.e,. Natural Law, will have negative consequences if acted upon. When a majority of a population shares a false "opinion" or belief, and ACT on it as they did from 2020-2022, many of those who DON'T share the same ignorance get harmed by their collective stupidity. The beauty of a Natural Law Republic as I have proposed it is that everyone is free to be as dumb or as brilliant as they choose. However, collective stupidity can and will have no effect on anyone other than the willfully ignorant.
Your idea of "natural law" is do no harm. I agree that as a collective we should uphold "do no harm". I don't like the word law because it insinuates an enforcer. I think there is a formula to nature which is cause and effect and I've seen you mention that too. it makes things much easier if we simply realize it is cause and effect. The reason 2020 happened is because we lie to each other. People say we must live our truth or be who we are, but the moment we are honest, we are slammed mercilessly. So it's not encouraged or practice to speak our truth. People cannot handle the truth. When 2020 happened, we should have told the others that covid isn't real. I did and they ignored me of course. But at least they heard it from someone. We need to speak our truth all the time and be open to others speaking theirs and debate them on any points that don't add up. This is imperative if we are to advance as a civilization. It's getting slightly better but many people today are utter wimps who react as though you've just slashed them with knives for simply making a mild criticism. Yet the accolades come in truckloads and are always welcome. We need to be as individuals, always open to critique and clear thinking enough to respond to it and learn if it reveals something we didn't notice before.
Great, well thought out post. Very few people will sit quietly and simply listen and digest before responding with an opinion that makes them comfortable. Little to none of what is actually going on IS comfortable, especially if it goes against what most of society has accepted as truth. As in “my opinion>your truth.
Absolutely. It drives me crazy that almost no one will stop and consider a different perspective. We've been so indoctrinated to think that thinking outside of any "official narrative" is somehow "crazy," so most people avoid actually listening and thinking because they don't want to think of themselves in "that camp." So, the conform to the majority and that's how we get the world we have now. Thanks for your feedback!
Many great points here, and I can relate. I've grown exhausted with attempting to educate the masses. As you stated, people listen to respond, not to understand. An example, I was an AA regular for many many years. Spent two years going to local prison facilities taking meetings to those that wanted to learn how to stop the madness. And what I eventually learned was that most folks just want to bitch and moan about their situation rather than listen to and absorb possible solutions for their problems. Great read Jake, I just might start at it again
I disagree that this is the problem. I am a statist and enjoy the use of money. The "money changers" who steal money by debasement of money are the problem. King Charles III and his "TerraCarta.world" along with Skull & Bones class of 1966 John Forbes Kerry are the problem with their WeatherModification.info hiding the Sun from Earth.
"Government and Statism alone has indoctrinated populations around the world that imposing your will on others is the solution to failed communication."
What I have proposed in all my my work would not only end the Fed, but all legacy institutions of enslavement, including Statism. But, yes, the debasement of money IS perhaps the greatest tool of enslavement known to man. If we were to unite and institute and entirely new system, EN MASSE (at least 10% of the population), there is nothing "they" could do to stop us. They don't have the resources to do so. This would be fully decentralized as everyone would stay where they are and thus, there would be no single "target" to attack. The most important piece of the puzzle would be to create the infrastructure to handle the debt-free currency and exchange system. But, look at all we've built thus far. A relatively simple task in the grand scheme of things.
Sounds great. I am interested in how land/home ownership in approached. Henry George proposed land tax to keep land monopolies small, and only land tax to pay for the necessary laws of the lands. That type of land owning philosophy appeals to me.
Private property is a foundation of personal freedom and autonomy. In a transition to a Natural Law Republic, all old mortgages would be re-negotiated to paying off remaining principal only, with the debt financing removed. There would be no property tax on homes or land. Those who are willing to put in the work to produce from the land and take care of it in the balance of nature are the ones who should own land and homes would become the full assets of the homeowner in this system.
A point-of-sale contribution program would be instituted to help finance the Public Service Administration employees, infrastructure, and court system. I would imagine on a national GDP of $20 trillion annually, that roughly 2-4% is all that would be needed on every exchange to fund this system as it would operate on a cost only basis. There would be NO income taxes or any of the other forms of taxation that are nothing more than theft. Again, with Natural Law as the guide, all solutions become self-evident.
As for farms and land usage, everything would be based in free market principles. Supply and demand would determine what they choose to grow and/or graze on their land. Permaculture, regenerative, and bio-dynamic farming practices would be encouraged and poisoning the soil would be a violation of their social contracts, so everything would find balance in this system.
Once people understand the 4 basic moral maxims, all agreements become common sense and ethics actually become important in society once again. This is the power of Natural Law. We are all bound by it whether we believe it or not, so aligning with it is the simplest way for society, civilization, and the human condition to heal.
By wanting to take something down, we engage in entropy which is the frequency of decay, distress, disease, and death. Just say the Fed was no longer, what would you do instead? Well do it now rather than take anything down. You see, if the Fed were no longer, you'd have to have something ready surely? Well, what is that something? That's the creative process, that puts us into the frequency of synergy, regeneration, creation, the opposite of entropy.
You should spend some time on that website. The FED is the MOB. We would replace the mob with honest trade, peace and prosperity for the people and the earth. The reason to end the FED is because they are the evil force in the world. They are the slave masters.
Skull & Bones is the "Brotherhood of Death" cabal who steals from everyone to plunder and make war, drug people and put them in prison. To End The FED is to end the power of people willing to do evil. We want to live in a world of good.
Yes I know what the Fed is but why not just build the new? Why this obsession with tearing them down? The answer is revenge isn't it? While in a state of revenge, you're actually in the same frequency that they are in, a barbaric, uncreative frequency which actually saps power. Frequency is something our barbaric culture isn't aware of and hence why individuals obey some perceived higher power.
You obviously do not understand what the FED is. They own you. Like the slave owners owned slaves. If you try to leave, they kill you or put you in prison. Daniel in the Lion's den. If you tell the truth they ban you. They are the "money changers" who killed Jesus, Lincoln, Kennedy, et.al. They are the warmongers. King Charles III is the owner of the FED and he is destroying earth with TerraCarta.world and spraying our skies to depopulate the world. WeatherModification.info Our world does not have to let evil rule.
Our goal is to stop them so we can live a good life and for posterity. You should join us in ending their destructive rule. It is not revenge. It is defense of our life itself.
You completely misinterpreted everything I said. I know about the Fed and everything you say about it I totally agree. But to try to take it down means you are wracked with revenge. There is only one way to take it down. We are minions and the Fed has all the advantages and all the power. It's like shooting a water pistol at a weaponized army to think you can take it down. The only way to take it down is to make it irrelevant in the old Buckminster Fuller way.
How do you propose to stop warmongering thieves with nuclear weapons and weather control techniques which block the Sun from warming the Earth stop killing life?
We need help stopping them in Western Colorado because they are filling our skies full of crap making it hard to breathe, hiding the sun, enhancing rainfall, enhancing drought, and they are killing our hobby farm and pastures. WeatherModification.info
I grasp what You've encountered. So Many insist that no matter what, Human society needs the slave-chains of money, and don't think that Our wealth in Their "trusts" is meaningful. They think We must keep proving that We input energy even if We had the free energy tech out and offering all the energy We can use.
I have been at this - well all My life, really, seeking why the explanations of things did not explain what I see. The "charity" institutions that collect enough money to ensure We ALL live well, but only a pittance is given to the Ones struggling. (Money use and psychopathy promote this.) The money collected in "new taxes" for a problem that is never solved for. (Psychopathically run controlminds promote this.) The diminishing quality of what is available while claims of "bigger and better" are made. (Money use promotes this (planned obsolescence) - and is by far the greatest contributor to waste on Our planet.)
But when the final piece fell into place, about 18 years ago, I have been going gangbusters to share awareness that We ALL are multimillionaires, that handing Our wealth over directly would not work, but that removing the accounting for the energy We add into a system WOULD return to Us Our wealth, such that We ALL can live as richly as We choose, and remove the single power tool the psychopaths have to affect all this psychopathic crap.
And still... It would seem Most would rather live in a world with money. Not seeing that, even if We swap out the token We use - "Get rid of fiat! Go to gold and silver!" - the same problems will arise.
The psychopaths (who actually "own" the bulk of the precious metals on Our planet now) will still have a tool to power. They will be promoted to the top as They break the three Laws of Ethics to get the most power. Lying, cheating stealing, robbing, torturing, killing wherever those will give Them advantage.
They will not look at the fact that Our planet has enough for ALL of Us 1,000 times over, believing the lie that We'll run out of everything any minute now. They will not look at the fact that there have been societies in the past that lived in abundance and never developed the mechanism to account for Our energy added. They will not see that there was no poverty, that the caring Ones took care of things and the psychopaths were outcast if They broke the Laws.
They cling to the idea that We need money to facilitate exchange, not seeing that when the abundance of Our planet is opened to Us, exchanging to survive becomes pointless. That We will, instead, do what We love to do, and offer the results for the thanks and love and reputation and respect and Self-satisfaction We receive - just as They did in the societies that developed in abundance.
They will not see that presently about 80% of the "jobs" overall merely facilitate the movement of Their wealth up to the psychopaths in control. These "jobs" are not needed for Humanity to survive. From cashiers to sales - to accounting, marketing, advertising, insurance, casinos, bill collection, tax collection, Wall Street, banking. None of these are the infrastructure, the food production, the transportation, the distribution... None of these would be seen in a SHTF scenario (SHTF, for any reader unaware is "shit hits the fan" - a catastrophic collapse of society). No telemarketers, tellers, accountants, and on and on, would be seen.
And all merely handle money that, overall moves upwards. And Few indeed there are who thought of these jobs as what They wanted to be when They grew up.
People cling to money as if it were Their life. Yet if They were freed of the need to account for Their energy added, They would help solve problems, get involved in projects, teach Others, and the arts and the sciences would burgeon, unfettered by money interests suppressing and perverting Their work.
Lies would not be taught, but rather, the truth. No incentive to lie. All a lie will bring is scorn when found out.
And though, from time to time, I think to quit - old, disabled (typing hurts), and all, still I want to end the enslavement practice of accounting for Our energy added into a ghastly and psychopathic legal/governmental system.
We do need a money system at least till we restructure the production and distribution systems. We cannot just go "cold turkey" without money because it would cause immense hardship and austerity as the infrastructure is still too centralized. We need to bring it back to local. This monetary system makes a lot of sense to me and we can do it so easily with the technology at our disposal today. Money is created when work is done. After all that's what money symbolized - energy. So you create the money when you work, when you produce, and give it to the recipient. Once the recipient spends the money, it is extinguished. So money is constantly being created and extinguished. It can still be saved. But the point is, money is issued by the sovereign therefore it is totally decentralized. Here is the detail on it: https://www.monetaryreform.com/summary.htm
It would not be "cold turkey." It will take about 10 years once free energy tech is out there. At first, the free energy addition will hardly be noticed. But, as the cost of energy is removed down the line, things will become cheaper and cheaper as the cost of energy is removed. And, as things become more affordable, We can put robots in where no One (or not enough of Us) wants to do necessary work.
The Ones who LOVE to create robots will no doubt be in Their element, earning praise, reputation and thanks for the best robotic solutions to the problem of not enough of Us wanting to do the necessary things.
As long as We retain ANY monetary system, the psychopaths WILL keep being in control, owning things They don't personally use, but pay others to use in unEthical fashion. And all money systems will chain Us to jobs that most of Us do not love to do... In any system where We have to prove We did some work - added Our energy - that is what We are stuck with, and People like Me, who struggle even to type (with bone spurs in My thumbs), will be screwed.
Add to all that, that We ALL are multimillionaires if not billionaires, having a share of the wealth of Our planet, but the psychopaths in control hold Our wealth in "trusts," and keep Us chained to money, with 80% of the "jobs" out there merely moving Our wealth up to Them. If ALL of Us had to add energy in actually creating needed things (infrastructure, food, transportation, etc.), We would have a VAST over-abundance of those things.
With robots, maybe 10% of Us are actually needed (and that is a high estimate). And to be sure, more than 10% of Those affected by any problem WILL be motivated to solve for it. Which means We ALL can easily live as the multimillionaires We are without having issues, because of the necessary "jobs" left after robots take the ones no One wants to do, there will be enough of Us who LOVE to do them.
I started reading at the link - will finish, for sure - but right off the bat We have an issue with the line the psychopaths tell Us about how "we continue to devour our resources." It is not Us who "devours" them, but the planned obsolescence foisted on Us for profit. As long as money is in use, there will be a motive to create things that run out or break so as to sell more.
Take money out and use the social currencies - reputation, respect, thanks, appreciation, love, lauds, fame, admiration, and all - and We will see things created with quality. No point to creating cheap crap.
Anyway, have You seen My article, Money... Do We Need It? I'll link here:
"Lying, cheating stealing, robbing, torturing, killing wherever those will give Them advantage."
1/3 of the people in the world are anarchists who will lie, cheat, steal, rob, torture, kidnap, and kill if there were no laws against it.
The "Beautiful Anarchy" by Jeffery Tucker's kids on the block don't get it. Anarchists who are voluntarists have been duped into believing that anarchy is liberty. It is for the tyrant. King Charles III being a prime example of a tyrant anarchist. TerraCarta.world
Whoa, whoa, whoa! Anarchy means no RULERS, **not** no RULES. There are three Laws, the rules of anarchy:
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
They are pandemoniumists if They would lie, cheat, steal, rob, torture, kidnap, and kill. That is NOT anarchy. (The psychopaths in control - by virtue of money, I might add - have conflated anarchy with pandemonium, and that's why so Many freak out at the mention of it.)
Tell that to King Charles III and the king's men who fill our skies full of crap to cool the planet and see if they stop killing life on Earth.
What ever you want to call them is fine with me. You call him a pandemoniumist. I call him an anarchist because that is what I believe. I am a voluntarist living in anarchy. And I am a statist because the duty of the state is to secure individual liberty, my unalienable rights, and my home. Anarchy is not charged with that duty.
Pardon Me, but, as "anarchy" means "no rulers," and a "king" is a ruler... You can call it that, and even believe that, but You would be incorrect. Tyranny, yes. The psychopaths in control (who control "king" Charles) are tyrants. And it's not just england that is being sprayed. The whole of Our planet is. Much like the whole of Our planet fell into lockstep for an imaginary bug. We have a planetary problem of psychopaths in control.
And I am an anarchist, as I cannot see any advantage to giving that power to some few Others - that power that drives psychopaths to get it - over Others who do not have that power. It is the duty of ALL of Us to secure Our freedom ("liberty" is what ships' captains give the crew, and though, like anarchy was conflated, freedom was conflated with liberty). Protecting Ourselves and Others from bullies, whether in costumes or not.
There are no Others above Me. I am sovereign, and aim for a society of Ethical sovereigns. And the foundational rights include the right to bear arms - of any sort - to protect from bullies.
It is clear that You have the indoctrinated idea of an anarchy, a society of Ethical sovereigns. But when You see that abdicating Your power to Others will only lead to being controlled by psychopaths, You might want to reconsider abdicating Yours. You are a voluntarist living in a planetary tyranny of psychopaths, promoted to the top through money and controlminds.
And You might ponder how well that state (that You call an "anarchy") is working for You. Here in the US, the for-profit corporation (since 1871) is stripping Us of freedoms little by little. Home of the free no more. ALL contolminds will degrade into power plays against the People by the psychopaths.
“you can’t tell people that they don’t have a right to their opinion.”
I want to break this down a bit...true anyone can have any opinion they want. But what we challenge is not the right to have an opinion, it is the veracity of that opinion. People can believe in the spaghetti monster if they want to or the tooth fairy or god, or science or anything else, but every opinion needs to be challenged otherwise there is no difference as you pointed out, between truth and baloney.
The point is, any opinion not aligned with objective reality, i.e,. Natural Law, will have negative consequences if acted upon. When a majority of a population shares a false "opinion" or belief, and ACT on it as they did from 2020-2022, many of those who DON'T share the same ignorance get harmed by their collective stupidity. The beauty of a Natural Law Republic as I have proposed it is that everyone is free to be as dumb or as brilliant as they choose. However, collective stupidity can and will have no effect on anyone other than the willfully ignorant.
Your idea of "natural law" is do no harm. I agree that as a collective we should uphold "do no harm". I don't like the word law because it insinuates an enforcer. I think there is a formula to nature which is cause and effect and I've seen you mention that too. it makes things much easier if we simply realize it is cause and effect. The reason 2020 happened is because we lie to each other. People say we must live our truth or be who we are, but the moment we are honest, we are slammed mercilessly. So it's not encouraged or practice to speak our truth. People cannot handle the truth. When 2020 happened, we should have told the others that covid isn't real. I did and they ignored me of course. But at least they heard it from someone. We need to speak our truth all the time and be open to others speaking theirs and debate them on any points that don't add up. This is imperative if we are to advance as a civilization. It's getting slightly better but many people today are utter wimps who react as though you've just slashed them with knives for simply making a mild criticism. Yet the accolades come in truckloads and are always welcome. We need to be as individuals, always open to critique and clear thinking enough to respond to it and learn if it reveals something we didn't notice before.
Great, well thought out post. Very few people will sit quietly and simply listen and digest before responding with an opinion that makes them comfortable. Little to none of what is actually going on IS comfortable, especially if it goes against what most of society has accepted as truth. As in “my opinion>your truth.
Absolutely. It drives me crazy that almost no one will stop and consider a different perspective. We've been so indoctrinated to think that thinking outside of any "official narrative" is somehow "crazy," so most people avoid actually listening and thinking because they don't want to think of themselves in "that camp." So, the conform to the majority and that's how we get the world we have now. Thanks for your feedback!
Many great points here, and I can relate. I've grown exhausted with attempting to educate the masses. As you stated, people listen to respond, not to understand. An example, I was an AA regular for many many years. Spent two years going to local prison facilities taking meetings to those that wanted to learn how to stop the madness. And what I eventually learned was that most folks just want to bitch and moan about their situation rather than listen to and absorb possible solutions for their problems. Great read Jake, I just might start at it again
Yes.
I disagree that this is the problem. I am a statist and enjoy the use of money. The "money changers" who steal money by debasement of money are the problem. King Charles III and his "TerraCarta.world" along with Skull & Bones class of 1966 John Forbes Kerry are the problem with their WeatherModification.info hiding the Sun from Earth.
"Government and Statism alone has indoctrinated populations around the world that imposing your will on others is the solution to failed communication."
The first step toward the solution is to EndTheFED.world
What I have proposed in all my my work would not only end the Fed, but all legacy institutions of enslavement, including Statism. But, yes, the debasement of money IS perhaps the greatest tool of enslavement known to man. If we were to unite and institute and entirely new system, EN MASSE (at least 10% of the population), there is nothing "they" could do to stop us. They don't have the resources to do so. This would be fully decentralized as everyone would stay where they are and thus, there would be no single "target" to attack. The most important piece of the puzzle would be to create the infrastructure to handle the debt-free currency and exchange system. But, look at all we've built thus far. A relatively simple task in the grand scheme of things.
Sounds great. I am interested in how land/home ownership in approached. Henry George proposed land tax to keep land monopolies small, and only land tax to pay for the necessary laws of the lands. That type of land owning philosophy appeals to me.
Private property is a foundation of personal freedom and autonomy. In a transition to a Natural Law Republic, all old mortgages would be re-negotiated to paying off remaining principal only, with the debt financing removed. There would be no property tax on homes or land. Those who are willing to put in the work to produce from the land and take care of it in the balance of nature are the ones who should own land and homes would become the full assets of the homeowner in this system.
A point-of-sale contribution program would be instituted to help finance the Public Service Administration employees, infrastructure, and court system. I would imagine on a national GDP of $20 trillion annually, that roughly 2-4% is all that would be needed on every exchange to fund this system as it would operate on a cost only basis. There would be NO income taxes or any of the other forms of taxation that are nothing more than theft. Again, with Natural Law as the guide, all solutions become self-evident.
As for farms and land usage, everything would be based in free market principles. Supply and demand would determine what they choose to grow and/or graze on their land. Permaculture, regenerative, and bio-dynamic farming practices would be encouraged and poisoning the soil would be a violation of their social contracts, so everything would find balance in this system.
Once people understand the 4 basic moral maxims, all agreements become common sense and ethics actually become important in society once again. This is the power of Natural Law. We are all bound by it whether we believe it or not, so aligning with it is the simplest way for society, civilization, and the human condition to heal.
By wanting to take something down, we engage in entropy which is the frequency of decay, distress, disease, and death. Just say the Fed was no longer, what would you do instead? Well do it now rather than take anything down. You see, if the Fed were no longer, you'd have to have something ready surely? Well, what is that something? That's the creative process, that puts us into the frequency of synergy, regeneration, creation, the opposite of entropy.
You should spend some time on that website. The FED is the MOB. We would replace the mob with honest trade, peace and prosperity for the people and the earth. The reason to end the FED is because they are the evil force in the world. They are the slave masters.
Skull & Bones is the "Brotherhood of Death" cabal who steals from everyone to plunder and make war, drug people and put them in prison. To End The FED is to end the power of people willing to do evil. We want to live in a world of good.
Yes I know what the Fed is but why not just build the new? Why this obsession with tearing them down? The answer is revenge isn't it? While in a state of revenge, you're actually in the same frequency that they are in, a barbaric, uncreative frequency which actually saps power. Frequency is something our barbaric culture isn't aware of and hence why individuals obey some perceived higher power.
You obviously do not understand what the FED is. They own you. Like the slave owners owned slaves. If you try to leave, they kill you or put you in prison. Daniel in the Lion's den. If you tell the truth they ban you. They are the "money changers" who killed Jesus, Lincoln, Kennedy, et.al. They are the warmongers. King Charles III is the owner of the FED and he is destroying earth with TerraCarta.world and spraying our skies to depopulate the world. WeatherModification.info Our world does not have to let evil rule.
Our goal is to stop them so we can live a good life and for posterity. You should join us in ending their destructive rule. It is not revenge. It is defense of our life itself.
You completely misinterpreted everything I said. I know about the Fed and everything you say about it I totally agree. But to try to take it down means you are wracked with revenge. There is only one way to take it down. We are minions and the Fed has all the advantages and all the power. It's like shooting a water pistol at a weaponized army to think you can take it down. The only way to take it down is to make it irrelevant in the old Buckminster Fuller way.
How do you propose to stop warmongering thieves with nuclear weapons and weather control techniques which block the Sun from warming the Earth stop killing life?
We need help stopping them in Western Colorado because they are filling our skies full of crap making it hard to breathe, hiding the sun, enhancing rainfall, enhancing drought, and they are killing our hobby farm and pastures. WeatherModification.info
I grasp what You've encountered. So Many insist that no matter what, Human society needs the slave-chains of money, and don't think that Our wealth in Their "trusts" is meaningful. They think We must keep proving that We input energy even if We had the free energy tech out and offering all the energy We can use.
I have been at this - well all My life, really, seeking why the explanations of things did not explain what I see. The "charity" institutions that collect enough money to ensure We ALL live well, but only a pittance is given to the Ones struggling. (Money use and psychopathy promote this.) The money collected in "new taxes" for a problem that is never solved for. (Psychopathically run controlminds promote this.) The diminishing quality of what is available while claims of "bigger and better" are made. (Money use promotes this (planned obsolescence) - and is by far the greatest contributor to waste on Our planet.)
But when the final piece fell into place, about 18 years ago, I have been going gangbusters to share awareness that We ALL are multimillionaires, that handing Our wealth over directly would not work, but that removing the accounting for the energy We add into a system WOULD return to Us Our wealth, such that We ALL can live as richly as We choose, and remove the single power tool the psychopaths have to affect all this psychopathic crap.
And still... It would seem Most would rather live in a world with money. Not seeing that, even if We swap out the token We use - "Get rid of fiat! Go to gold and silver!" - the same problems will arise.
The psychopaths (who actually "own" the bulk of the precious metals on Our planet now) will still have a tool to power. They will be promoted to the top as They break the three Laws of Ethics to get the most power. Lying, cheating stealing, robbing, torturing, killing wherever those will give Them advantage.
They will not look at the fact that Our planet has enough for ALL of Us 1,000 times over, believing the lie that We'll run out of everything any minute now. They will not look at the fact that there have been societies in the past that lived in abundance and never developed the mechanism to account for Our energy added. They will not see that there was no poverty, that the caring Ones took care of things and the psychopaths were outcast if They broke the Laws.
They cling to the idea that We need money to facilitate exchange, not seeing that when the abundance of Our planet is opened to Us, exchanging to survive becomes pointless. That We will, instead, do what We love to do, and offer the results for the thanks and love and reputation and respect and Self-satisfaction We receive - just as They did in the societies that developed in abundance.
They will not see that presently about 80% of the "jobs" overall merely facilitate the movement of Their wealth up to the psychopaths in control. These "jobs" are not needed for Humanity to survive. From cashiers to sales - to accounting, marketing, advertising, insurance, casinos, bill collection, tax collection, Wall Street, banking. None of these are the infrastructure, the food production, the transportation, the distribution... None of these would be seen in a SHTF scenario (SHTF, for any reader unaware is "shit hits the fan" - a catastrophic collapse of society). No telemarketers, tellers, accountants, and on and on, would be seen.
And all merely handle money that, overall moves upwards. And Few indeed there are who thought of these jobs as what They wanted to be when They grew up.
People cling to money as if it were Their life. Yet if They were freed of the need to account for Their energy added, They would help solve problems, get involved in projects, teach Others, and the arts and the sciences would burgeon, unfettered by money interests suppressing and perverting Their work.
Lies would not be taught, but rather, the truth. No incentive to lie. All a lie will bring is scorn when found out.
And though, from time to time, I think to quit - old, disabled (typing hurts), and all, still I want to end the enslavement practice of accounting for Our energy added into a ghastly and psychopathic legal/governmental system.
I wrote this article and thought to share:
Money... Do We Need It?: https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/Money-DoWeNeedIt:4
Love always!
We do need a money system at least till we restructure the production and distribution systems. We cannot just go "cold turkey" without money because it would cause immense hardship and austerity as the infrastructure is still too centralized. We need to bring it back to local. This monetary system makes a lot of sense to me and we can do it so easily with the technology at our disposal today. Money is created when work is done. After all that's what money symbolized - energy. So you create the money when you work, when you produce, and give it to the recipient. Once the recipient spends the money, it is extinguished. So money is constantly being created and extinguished. It can still be saved. But the point is, money is issued by the sovereign therefore it is totally decentralized. Here is the detail on it: https://www.monetaryreform.com/summary.htm
It would not be "cold turkey." It will take about 10 years once free energy tech is out there. At first, the free energy addition will hardly be noticed. But, as the cost of energy is removed down the line, things will become cheaper and cheaper as the cost of energy is removed. And, as things become more affordable, We can put robots in where no One (or not enough of Us) wants to do necessary work.
The Ones who LOVE to create robots will no doubt be in Their element, earning praise, reputation and thanks for the best robotic solutions to the problem of not enough of Us wanting to do the necessary things.
As long as We retain ANY monetary system, the psychopaths WILL keep being in control, owning things They don't personally use, but pay others to use in unEthical fashion. And all money systems will chain Us to jobs that most of Us do not love to do... In any system where We have to prove We did some work - added Our energy - that is what We are stuck with, and People like Me, who struggle even to type (with bone spurs in My thumbs), will be screwed.
Add to all that, that We ALL are multimillionaires if not billionaires, having a share of the wealth of Our planet, but the psychopaths in control hold Our wealth in "trusts," and keep Us chained to money, with 80% of the "jobs" out there merely moving Our wealth up to Them. If ALL of Us had to add energy in actually creating needed things (infrastructure, food, transportation, etc.), We would have a VAST over-abundance of those things.
With robots, maybe 10% of Us are actually needed (and that is a high estimate). And to be sure, more than 10% of Those affected by any problem WILL be motivated to solve for it. Which means We ALL can easily live as the multimillionaires We are without having issues, because of the necessary "jobs" left after robots take the ones no One wants to do, there will be enough of Us who LOVE to do them.
I started reading at the link - will finish, for sure - but right off the bat We have an issue with the line the psychopaths tell Us about how "we continue to devour our resources." It is not Us who "devours" them, but the planned obsolescence foisted on Us for profit. As long as money is in use, there will be a motive to create things that run out or break so as to sell more.
Take money out and use the social currencies - reputation, respect, thanks, appreciation, love, lauds, fame, admiration, and all - and We will see things created with quality. No point to creating cheap crap.
Anyway, have You seen My article, Money... Do We Need It? I'll link here:
https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/money-do-we-need-it
"Lying, cheating stealing, robbing, torturing, killing wherever those will give Them advantage."
1/3 of the people in the world are anarchists who will lie, cheat, steal, rob, torture, kidnap, and kill if there were no laws against it.
The "Beautiful Anarchy" by Jeffery Tucker's kids on the block don't get it. Anarchists who are voluntarists have been duped into believing that anarchy is liberty. It is for the tyrant. King Charles III being a prime example of a tyrant anarchist. TerraCarta.world
So is this guy.
Anarchists
https://sovren.media/p/263932/68d4cd47e8e7f8102532a844f8e42525
Whoa, whoa, whoa! Anarchy means no RULERS, **not** no RULES. There are three Laws, the rules of anarchy:
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
They are pandemoniumists if They would lie, cheat, steal, rob, torture, kidnap, and kill. That is NOT anarchy. (The psychopaths in control - by virtue of money, I might add - have conflated anarchy with pandemonium, and that's why so Many freak out at the mention of it.)
The Rules of Anarchy: https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-rules-of-anarchy-8-minute-video:8?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
Tell that to King Charles III and the king's men who fill our skies full of crap to cool the planet and see if they stop killing life on Earth.
What ever you want to call them is fine with me. You call him a pandemoniumist. I call him an anarchist because that is what I believe. I am a voluntarist living in anarchy. And I am a statist because the duty of the state is to secure individual liberty, my unalienable rights, and my home. Anarchy is not charged with that duty.
Pardon Me, but, as "anarchy" means "no rulers," and a "king" is a ruler... You can call it that, and even believe that, but You would be incorrect. Tyranny, yes. The psychopaths in control (who control "king" Charles) are tyrants. And it's not just england that is being sprayed. The whole of Our planet is. Much like the whole of Our planet fell into lockstep for an imaginary bug. We have a planetary problem of psychopaths in control.
And I am an anarchist, as I cannot see any advantage to giving that power to some few Others - that power that drives psychopaths to get it - over Others who do not have that power. It is the duty of ALL of Us to secure Our freedom ("liberty" is what ships' captains give the crew, and though, like anarchy was conflated, freedom was conflated with liberty). Protecting Ourselves and Others from bullies, whether in costumes or not.
There are no Others above Me. I am sovereign, and aim for a society of Ethical sovereigns. And the foundational rights include the right to bear arms - of any sort - to protect from bullies.
It is clear that You have the indoctrinated idea of an anarchy, a society of Ethical sovereigns. But when You see that abdicating Your power to Others will only lead to being controlled by psychopaths, You might want to reconsider abdicating Yours. You are a voluntarist living in a planetary tyranny of psychopaths, promoted to the top through money and controlminds.
And You might ponder how well that state (that You call an "anarchy") is working for You. Here in the US, the for-profit corporation (since 1871) is stripping Us of freedoms little by little. Home of the free no more. ALL contolminds will degrade into power plays against the People by the psychopaths.